The Pacific Maritime Association (PMA) has accused the International Longshore and Warehouse Union (ILWU) of disrupting cargo operations at the Port of Seattle through “coordinated and disruptive labor actions.” The PMA said the ILWU-ordered work slowdowns on June 9 caused cargo operations at the port to stop and prompted workers to be sent home, while the ILWU denied that their actions led to the closure of the ports and promised to negotiate a “fair and just” deal.
The previous contract between dockers and the ports expired on July 1, 2022, and negotiations on a new deal have remained at a standstill since May 10, 2022. A war of words between the two parties has grown more intense recently, fuelled by various, smaller measures such as work slowdowns in individual ports on the US West Coast. There is a growing concern that the situation could repeat itself in 2002, when the contract between the ILWU and the PMA expired, causing an estimated $10bn loss to the US economy as the ports remained shuttered.
After 11 days of negotiations proved fruitless, then-President Bush’s administration requested legal intervention to end the lockout and reopen the ports through the Taft-Hartley Act on October 9, 2002. Meanwhile, the backlog took weeks to clear and left many questioning the effectiveness of unionized labor. As the deadlock continues between the PMA and ILWU, many are concerned that the two parties have not learned from previous experiences and that the delay in reaching an agreement could cause yet another economic loss to the nation.
The US West Coast news reports suggest that the ports’ closure is due to poor trade conditions since the earlier labour dispute. Many terminal operators and shippers are urging the two parties to reach an agreement soon. The only hope that remains for this situation is for both PMA and IWLU to reach a mutually beneficial agreement quickly before causing further damages to an already struggling economy.
Share it now