The Impact of IMO’s Decarbonization Targets on the Shipping Industry

The recent agreement by the International Maritime Organization (IMO) on decarbonization targets has left the shipping industry with mixed reactions. For tanker and bulker owners, the agreement is seen as a win as it introduces more uncertainty about future regulations, limiting the ordering of new ships. However, for shippers of container freight, the agreement increases the risk of significantly higher freight costs in the future due to the inclusion of a timeline for developing a global carbon tax.

The final agreement reached by the IMO is ambitious, but it is also riddled with vague language, causing some environmental organizations to criticize it as a “wish and a prayer agreement.” The plan includes targets to reduce greenhouse gas emissions from shipping by at least 20% by 2030 and aims for a 30% reduction. It also sets a checkpoint to reduce emissions by at least 70% by 2040, with a goal of 80%. Additionally, the agreement calls for the shipping industry to achieve net-zero greenhouse gas emissions by or around 2050.

Container shipping companies have been focusing on alternative fuel types such as LNG and methanol, but these fuels are much more expensive than traditional bunker fuel. Switching to “green” methanol, produced from biomass, could increase fuel costs by 350%, which would ultimately be passed on to shippers. A global carbon tax is seen as necessary to level the playing field and incentivize the adoption of alternative fuels.

However, it remains uncertain whether a global carbon tax will be agreed upon by the IMO’s 175 member states. Some countries may oppose the tax if they believe it will harm their economies. In the meantime, the gradual inclusion of shipping in the EU Emissions Trading Scheme (ETS) will begin in 2024, further increasing costs for shippers.

The uncertainty surrounding future regulations and fuel choices has led to a decrease in new ship orders for tankers and bulk carriers. Shipowners are hesitant to invest in ships that may become prematurely obsolete, and banks are reluctant to provide funding. The lack of clarity from the IMO agreement may further deter new ship orders, which could negatively impact future freight rates.

Overall, the IMO agreement has created more uncertainty and ambiguity within the shipping industry. Shipowners are adopting a “wait and see” approach before committing to new fuel types, and there is concern that the lack of clarity may hinder the IMO’s decarbonization plans. Without a clear roadmap and guidelines for alternative fuels, the industry may struggle to meet the greenhouse gas targets set by the IMO.

Source .